Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.
KMID : 1141820230230020289
Journal of Gastric Cancer
2023 Volume.23 No. 2 p.289 ~ p.302
Exploratory Analysis of Patients With Gastric/Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma With or Without Liver Metastasis From the Phase 3 RAINBOW Study
Takatsugu Ogata

Yukiya Narita
Zev A. Wainberg
Eugene Kim
Kensei Yamaguchi
Yongzhe Piao
Yumin Zhao
Patrick M. Peterson
Sameera R. Wijayawardana
Paolo Abada
Anindya Chatterjee
Anindya Chatterjee
Kei Muro
Abstract
Purpose : Liver metastasis (LM) is reported in approximately 40% of patients with advanced/metastatic gastric/gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (metastatic esophagogastric adenocarcinoma; mGEA) and is associated with a worse prognosis. This post-hoc analysis from the RAINBOW trial reported the efficacy, safety, and biomarker outcomes of ramucirumab and paclitaxel combination treatment (RAM+PAC) in patients with (LM+) and without (LM?) LM at baseline.

Materials and Methods : Patients (n=665) were randomly assigned on a 1:1 basis to receive either RAM+PAC (LM+: 150, LM?: 180) or placebo and paclitaxel (PL+PAC) (LM+: 138, LM?: 197). The overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were evaluated using stratified Kaplan?Meier and Cox regression models. The correlation of dichotomized biomarkers (VEGF-C, D; VEGFR-1,2) with efficacy in the LM+ versus LM? subgroups was analyzed using the Cox regression model with reported interaction P-values.

Results : The presence of LM was associated with earlier progression than those without LM, particularly in patients receiving PL+PAC (hazard ratio [HR], 1.68). RAM+PAC treatment improved OS and PFS irrespective of LM status but showed greater improvement in LM+ than that in LM? (OS HR, 0.71 [LM+] vs. 0.88 [LM?]; PFS HR, 0.47 [LM+] vs. 0.76 [LM?]). Treatment-emergent adverse events were similar between patients with and without LM. No predictive relationship was observed between biomarker levels (VEGF-C, D; VEGFR-1,2) and efficacy outcome (OS, PFS) (all interaction P-values >0.05).

Conclusions : RAM provided a significant benefit, irrespective of LM status; however, its effect was numerically stronger in patients with LM. Therefore, RAM+PAC is a clinically meaningful therapeutic option for patients with mGEA and LM.
KEYWORD
Ramucirumab, Stomach neoplasms, Vascular endothelial growth factors
FullTexts / Linksout information
Listed journal information